the Blackthorn Orphans
  • B L O G
  • The Blackthorn Orphans: read it onsite
  • The Blackthorn Orphans TRANSLATIONS PAGE
  • Lovely R BLOG
  • PHOTOESSAYS
  • SELECTED RAVINGS: essays & opinion
  • RUBYHUE Lipstick Review
  • blackthorn ROSE REVIEW
  • KITCHEN BITCH: Recipes etc.
  • verse
  • Hostile Witness FILM REVIEW
  • ALOES & SUCCULENTS
  • Blackthorn Perfume Review
  • B I O
  • C O N T A C T

Hostile Witness Film Review: The Big Short, Narcos, Sherpa, 10 Cloverfield Lane

12/10/2016

 
Picture
The Big Short  2015 Adam McKay
It’s long been obvious to any thinking person that the 2007 economic clusterfuck was the inevitable flowering of a diseased system. The Big Short makes excellent use of this organic metaphor, following a handful of American investors along the sub-prime food chain, delineating the mechanisms that allowed both the housing market to face-plant and those investors to bet on precisely that outcome.  On paper the thing is one and a half hours of everything that bores and displeases me; bro ensembles, splainin, Ryan Gosling, coke weasel shit, forth-wall riffs and pube-twisting cameos.  But McKay returns the human flesh to what so often seems like a skeletal, Meccano fiasco, using impeccable pacing to drag us up and down the focal plane from micro to macro understandings, in a quite sophisticated and even entertaining process.  It’s definitely unsettling, being entertained by all these sludgy parasitic shenanigans, but I’ll cop to being sucked in.  It really does squeeze those lemons into something tartly satisfying.

Christian Bale flirts with the idea of munching scenery as Michael Burry, hedge-fund weirdo, but ultimately restricts himself to nibbling the curtains.  Everyone else is fine (even Gosling) with special mention going to Steve Carell as the kind of permanently-disgusted/morbidly curious playerhater that many of us can relate to.  Brad Pitt nearly butterfingers the gravitas he was going for with a beardy mumblecore delivery, but oh well- when was the last time you watched something specifically for him?  Shit, Kalifornia?  Fight Club, maybe.  He’s better at picking projects than he is at acting in the fucking things and The Big Short is another of Plan B’s finer moments.  

Picture
Narcos  2015
​Chris Brancato/Carlo Bernard/ Doug Miro

You’ve probably been swatting away the buzz around this Netflix series for a while now but don’t let that positive word of mouth put you off.  Narcos tracks the rise of Pablo Escobar from shitkicking cash-n-carry pirate to head of the world’s premier blow cartel and the personal prerogatives that dragged Colombia to the brink of sociopolitical collapse using an unusually digestible blend of unvarnished fact and folkloric embellishment.  

This sort of treatment can go so, so wrong and Boyd Holbrook’s DEA gringo voiceover, molester moustache and inert stylings were difficult to swallow for the first few episodes.  Fortunately, Netflix offset his plomo with a deliciously apposite Pedro Pascal and a solid gold supporting cast- Paulina Gaitán and Stephanie Sigman are perfect as wife and mistress respectively and Wagner Moura’s Escobar is probably the kind of Pablo the latter aspired to.  Awesome too was the decision to film almost everything in Spanish and in Colombia itself, the language and landscape delivering so much more nuance than any bullshit transcription could possibly have provided (we’re still walking around saying drogas and tranquilo at each other). 

Picture
Refreshingly, Narcos doesn’t try to dredge any moral dichotomy out of a conflict that saw a cartel kingpin elected to office and death squads with presidential imprimaturs. The current series chart the entirety of Escobar’s inevitably bell-shaped course and there are some small moments of lag and déjà vécu amid an otherwise fairly breathless trajectory, but that's a petty complaint.  Encouragingly, it felt like Netflix was taking an anti-GoT stance by holding sexual violence to a single non-gratuitous incident and keeping the rest of the brutality contextual; there’s no way or need to exaggerate the kind of depraved shit Colombia endured anyway.  

Casual voyeurs won’t get too much joy from Narcos but fans of addictive narrative, coherent visual style and total immersion should definitely inspect.  Another two series are slated for production: muy impaciente.

Picture
Sherpa 2015 Jennifer Peedom
As a New Zealander, I feel a particular edge to the criticisms of the Himalayan climbing industry’s exploitation of Nepal’s tribal porter contingent.  Hillary's famous ascent of Everest, his lifelong commitment to charitable work in the region and the calamitous dismantling of New Zealand's own labour protections pertain directly to expedition companies replete with Kiwis.  So it was chilling indeed to watch an expat rationalise his duplicitous treatment of Nepali labourers, given the price the latter have already paid to maintain their stake in what is effectively the only game in town. 

Jennifer Peedom’s timely snapshot of the infamous 2014 Everest climbing season centres around Phurba Tashi, a veteran Sherpa facing tearful pressure from his family to quit the mountain despite their financial dependance on his paltry wages.  After an avalanche cuts a fatal swathe through both climbers and porters Tashi and his fellow Sherpa down tools; what unfolds is a pretty unseemly summary of the imperiousness, entitlement, indifference and contempt that blight the modern industry.  If you find pay-to-play climbing distasteful and exploitative, Sherpa will not disabuse you of those assumptions.  Fabulous cinematography and the kind of unassuming inquiry that invites spoiled fuckwits to unload on camera are the icing on a sobering cake.

Picture
10 Cloverfield Lane  2016 Dan Trachtenberg
Random chick ends up in a dodgy survivalist’s basement as an intergalactic (you bloody well know it’s an alien scenario so don’t bother clutching any spoiler pearls) invasion begins, forcing her to choose between ducking fallout for a decade or busting her way back into whatever reality awaits.  

Full disclosure- we weren’t expecting much from that dusty premise (JJ Abrams shit: the eyeroll is implied) and if we hadn’t been so hard up for a Friday night watch we would never have bothered.  I wish we could somehow monetise that eerie prescience because 10 Cloverfield Lane didn’t deliver any more than a less stupidly entertaining iteration of the rather scrawny mechanics employed by its splashier predecessor, Cloverfield, which kept us quiet with wrathful tentacles and the promise of urban effacement.  You know- running, jumping, darkness, the tenuousness of human association stuff blah blah?  Budget redux time. 

Imma do right by my Lovecraft people and tell you there’s not much Cthuloid DNA awaiting your patient indulgence of this subterranean fuckery and let’s face it- what else were we hoping for?  I salute Mary Elizabeth Winstead’s earnest turn as the interred ingenue (she had fuck-all to work with) and slow-clap the discreet tenor of all those potentially gross interpersonal dynamics.  John Gallagher Jr is actually pretty good as her unlikely consort and John Goodman does a great twitchy John Goodman impression but we already knew that.  The rest is all join-the-dots kinetic resolution of a problem you won’t really give a shit about. Technically, 10 Cloverfield is well-executed, at least until the final sequence which looks like it was filmed inside a rhino's arse at midnight after ten production designers bolted in ten different directions rather than decide what the monsters were going to look like.  We wanted explicit visual payoff, for fuck's sake.  We got a wet fart in a shared raincoat.

​It wasn’t spectacularly terrible.  Just… less worthwhile than almost anything else we could have been doing.  

*   More Hostile Witness Film Review   *   Read the Book onsite   *


Monday slash Tuesday slash Basic Instinct

5/9/2016

 
Picture
Watched Basic Instinct (R calls it Budget Instinct but still ogles it with me) again last night.  I get this peculiar occasional thirst for it even though I consider it both baffling and theoretically repugnant.  Subjecting oneself to BI for the hundredth fucking time is like eating all three remaining pieces of monster lemon cheesecake, even though you already have the sugar shakes and they would have fit comfortably in the fridge as you well know.  Or going back for that last spot on the hot knives when you're dicing with laughter incontinence and are only semi-aware of the thumbtack buried in your right foot. It's not good.  But you keep doing it.

What is a world without
 Shazza's glassy pissholes in the snow as she toys so mercilessly with her inferiors?  Her titivated funbags in that backless gold lamé? 
Her coven of murderous cock-dodgers, or (last but not least, and be still my heart) Roxy's angry dancing?  I don't want to know, and I'm not really sorry.

What is Basic Instinct, after all this time?  Is it precisely what it superficially seems i.e. a greasy pool of Michael Douglas-scented garbage water, or some sort of slinky postmodern pro-lesbian cleverness artefact?  I'll use the moist towelette of historical context to clear my vision.
Eszterhas doubled down on his dodgy femmeschlock via Sliver and then went full retard with that masterful testament Showgirls.  He also penned fucking Flashdance, so it's safe to say he's had undue influence upon the contemporary limited intellect if nothing else.  I think it boils down to whether this is the best he could actually do, or if he was just dribbling wees on our leg and calling it Scotch mist.
Picture
If allowed to speak for itself, his oeuvre says consistently rapey and developmentally delayed.  But then it gave birth to Catherine Tramell with two Ls.  Watching her pegging a room full of sweaty male gelatine with her nasty-arse intellect, blithely exploiting the superior firepower of peekaboo pussy and making those shitlords drive her home afterwards puts hearts right in my eyes.  And really, the film smacks down the male gaze sniffing so avidly at its knickers with so many references to androgenic deficiency that I wonder how the average gonadal unit could raise a semi in its honour.  Catherine's stabby bitches just do bumps off their coke guy in white swing coats and stirrup pants while not telling us why they did it and not caring if we're mad.     
Picture
But all good things must come to an end, and like so much else upon this accursed plane, Basic Instinct nosedives into a bucket of pre-cummy pandering and outright disappointment.  
Roxy bites the big one trying to mow down her rival which is highly implausible given that she's butch and therefore practically born to drive at speed.  Bicurious Beth is made to apologise for any historic muffdiving before it threatens her access to the correctly male object of her real obsession, and she has the fucking nerve to pout after he actually grants her the heavenly 20 seconds of nonconsensual dicking she so clearly needed.  Ungrateful bitch.  Then Catherine goes and breaks my heart by consoling herself with drunk midlife policeman cock and spray-tanned turkey wattles as dangled by Michael soupy retch Douglas like shaved balls on a sticky afternoon.  All while Roxy is still wiping body fluids off her Cuban heels in that shadowy afterlife reserved for the most presumptuous of lesbians.      

I went to see BI at the cinema when it was released and remember all the public outrage attending it, some of which turned pretty fucking real in the uni bars on friday nights after warring Womens Studies factions got into the $3 rum and cokes.  Lady-loving ladies have many valid points about being coopted by hostile forces.  However, I'm bi- the worst sexual, found the straight characters more objectionable than the queer ones and the rest of it too wretchedly stupid to warrant most of that hot fuss.  Is that my trifling ambidextrous hoo-ha talking or have I just been bewitched by Verhoeven's stupid, slutty, caramel-tinted vision?  

In researching the flick I discovered two related factoids.  A: Sharon Stone supposedly never gave permission to be upskirted in lieu of panties during the interrogation scene, and B: claims she would have kept it in the movie, had she been the director.  Which... confuses me.  Not that I understand the tittering around that infamous alleged reveal anyway since the male hysterics insisting on its flagrance are clearly (and unsurprisingly) confused in regard to feminine anatomy.  These days you're subjected to more unsolicited pudenda whilst minding your own business on the bus into town, whether you bloody like it or not.   

 "You didn't feel anything for him, you just had sex with him for your book?"  

​Ha ha ha!  Next question.


Hostile Witnesss Film Review: Knight of Cups, Star Wars: the Force Awakens, Deadpool

4/5/2016

 
Picture
Knight of Cups (Terrence Malick, 2015)  
​Sometimes you just have to drag your lazy brain away from Godzilla for the 567th time and force it to contemplate something a little more demanding.  We weren't breaking our necks trying to watch Knight of Cups because... you know... Terrence Malick. We acknowledge the challenge he poses to the casual viewer, happily declare ourselves Malick apologists and didn't think it was really possible to be ambivalent about his work- a shiny badge of honour in our estimation.

That being said, audible narration almost always annoys the shit out of me and a thick crust of random decorative/pointless hos over anything is going to piss me off too. But then what's not to like about wandering ocular direction, atypical structures and hey, Christian Bale so... have we finally arrived at an equivocal reaction to Malickian produce?  Hells bells.  I think so.

Picture
Knight of Cups dangles like a stoned chimp from the titular themes of prodigality and purpose, Bale's Rick the incurable player rolling through his glitzy midlife terrain with equal helpings of angst and passive élan; women, family, friendship and privilege both buoy and constrain him; the promise of opportunity pinches his cheeks then recedes with the same tides that blur everything else he could or should be doing.  The universe withholds its most crucial directives except in the kind of frustrating allusions encoded in tarot; earthquakes and club nights are alike in their significance.  Rick parties and dawdles and fucks and regrets.  All that would be fine if Knight of Cups wasn't exactly like the experiences he's immured in- remotely visual, anaesthetised, tautological.  There is just too much maundering and ambient, chiffon-fuzzed fuckery.  If someone had taken some heavy-gauge shears to this thing, we might have been happier, but then... it would be just like everything else; literal and cursory.

No one does wandering/pondering like Malick, so don't listen to all the jelly haters- it's not like KoC is a waste of your valuable time.  I doubt anything he ever does will enjoy that dubious distinction.  If it's taken you a while to get over yourself and rent the damn thing, hit the button or you'll miss stuff like Terrence using the utterly incomparable Emmanuel Lubezki like a charmed bird on his hand, seeing it all and explaining everything, rendering sound and even performance largely redundant.  Even if you're not into all that temporal tapioca you might as well glide disembodied though LA and Vegas on the slick scales of a VIP pass or get your head dunked in a cold breaker- what the fuck else were you going to be doing?  The swoony ride is well worth the price of admission.

Some of his contemporaries have insisted that Malick needs an actual fucking writer and I would concur if I thought he needed words at all. He really doesn't, and that is a truly transcendent achievement. KoC is probably best viewed with the volume off; the cast's breathy observations contribute little and are elbowed into insignificance by the visuals anyway; the performances are solid within the same slightly pointless context.  No one really blew us out of our shoes but I will say Bale largely rose to the challenge of his nebulous mandate and managed to get Rick the peripatetic dumbarse onto the screen in a recognisable form, for which he probably deserves all the darn Oscars.
Picture
​You might want to kick Knight of Cups across the room for being exactly the kind of existential navel dig we all love to hate, but it has pretty eyes and a noble mind.  We were left thinking fairly deep thoughts about the hopeless relativity of perception and the joyous pointlessness of it all, which is never a bad thing.

Picture
Star Wars: The Force Awakens  (J.J Abrams, 2015)
I’m old enough to remember the original original SW release; I wasn’t jerking off to its awkward, nonsensical, sexless juvenilia back then and I'm not jizzing my pants over the prospect of more, so yeah, I think it's fair to say this is a disinterested assessment.  Despite all the screechy fangasms, SW:TFA is just a lukewarm rehash, repackaging the first trilogy into a contemporary launchpad for the endless instalments to come, cleansing the central concepts of their less palatable nerdscurf whilst pandering to the infamous conservatism of the fanbase with a truly stunning lack of creativity.  Reiteration is a perfectly acceptable device, but christ on a fucking cracker, man, this shit was straight-up déjà vu bromide.

Booting Lucas from his own goofy-arse oeuvre was always going to be a good decision.  Abram’s middlebrow extruded vanilla stylings haven't exactly stolen my heart either, but he is a perfect fit for this pedestrian material- there, I said two nice things.  

Star Wars seems thematically and tonally archaic these days and not in a good way.  Stripped of their novelty, the gallactical faux-politics are laughably moribund; the Rebel Alliance is still a wee bit rebellious and it is rumoured that they do plan to flip off the oppressors from a prudent distance in the fullness of time, going forward.  But hey, the Empire seems to have pulled finger and rebranded- they've got yes, another Death Star blowing shit up from afar; the monstrous and cowardly injustice of it all etc etc.  Whatevs.

Picture
Daisy Ridley's Not-Luke Rey is the project's only real saving grace, her performance featuring decent servings of both dignity and energy and I suppose we should be grateful these days that it was sans heaving bewbs and sexual violence.  John Boyega's earnest sidekick Finn was... inexplicably enthusiastic and though I would happily fondle pocket Venus Oscar Isaac's unmentionables, his turn as heroic pilot Poe Dameron (sounds like a gourmet fruit paste) did not move me.  Han Solo dies 9 minutes too late into his roughly 10 minute role.  Carrie Fischer looked like she was simultaneously hoarding coins between her buttocks and longing to kick the shit out of Ford who throws down a suspiciously accurate compilation of pissy old arseholes everywhere, if that's what you're into.  Adam Driver's Not-Darth Vader was as about exciting as a total lack of plausible motivation and demonstrable pathology could possibly allow i.e. not very, but there's obviously a market for Ambien-dependant nonthreatening villains suffering Irritable Bowel Syndrome or perhaps the embarrassment of intimate pleather burns.  Something was troubling him, dammit.
​
To an old bitch like me, the visual feel was disappointingly non-filmic, scrubbing the meagre appeal of the originals.  And now I'm running out of shit to say.  It’s not like we hated SW:TFA; there’s nothing there to get riled up about.  Chalking that up as a thumbs-down situation.


Picture
Deadpool (Tim Miller, 2016)
Why don't I just say what I really mean and tell you this tiresomely self-referential, five-year-old internet meme/microwave dinner with the plastic melted into it type-thing bored the everliving shit out of us?  

It really, really did. Ryan Reynolds is blessed with the comic timing of a dugong, killing jokes like they're a fucking threat to his family; maybe it's just that I'm not a sheltered fourteen year old boy but I found the alleged darksided humour dated and embarrassingly harmless.  If the writing did occasionally get there, very few spontaneous smirks survived Reynolds' insecure bugfuck delivery.

The action was mediocre, the story retrograde-retarded, the origin shit made me wonder what we'd done to deserve it and there was no sign whatsoever of the saucy gayness and dodgy adult themes that I was promised. Which strikes me as A: fatal shortchanging of such a proprietary fandom or B: karmic redress upon numbnuts with no fucking taste.  Just don't fall for the oversell. Deadpool is nowhere near as clever or subversive as you might be hoping.

*   More Hostile Witness Review   *   Selected Ravings   *   Photoessays   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Black Mass, Slow West

18/2/2016

 
Picture
Slow West  (2015, John Maclean)
I know it cleaned up at Sundance, but these days that sort of acclaim gives me more pause than encouragement and just so you know, I fucking loathe whimsical improbability.  Improbability should put its dick in your mouth and make you love it or we're just wasting valuable nose-picking time.  Example: I made it through eight minutes of The Grand Budapest Hotel and six of them were spent writhing in visceral agony.  That's where we stand on the issue.  

We endured half an hour of 
Slow West, not because it was slow, but because it was boring, gingerly improbably whimsical, poorly written, badly cast and listing portside with a queasy gutful of quirky stock characters (stabs self repeatedly) before halftime sounded.  Kodi Smit-McPhee as Jay the gormless Scottish youth in search of his great love Rose in the titular colonial wilds is... well, I could say a few things, but they would all be unkind.  He looks twelve, exactly like the sort of pissant who wouldn't know passion from a jar of fucking capers and that matters when amour fou is supposed to be driving him across an unknown vastness into mortal peril.  Especially in contrast to Michael Fassbender's Silas, a crusty-with-a-heart-of-gold bounty hunter (it burns!),  Michael tries too hard and will always be too much in such a sea of not enough.

Picture
This titanic discrepancy between the two leads howls at you from their first shared frames but that wasn't my first clue that Slow West would piss me off.  It's also incredibly derivative and I can't help but wonder what sort of critical reception this twee, indulgent bollocks would have attracted had a woman been responsible.  Then I remember that a chick could never have gotten Slow West green-lit in the first place.  Phew, eh?
​      
And can I just say that as a New Zealander I’ve had it up to my tits with our local landscapes (in this case someone's shitty pine plantation and back-country sheep block) being lazily passed off as everything from Mexico to the Himalayas?  
Slow West scrapes that budget visual barrel to the extent that I expected to see someone wander into shot scratching their arse in a fucking Swandri, and all while no one can get a specifically, authentically New Zealand story funded.  The NZ Film Commission that bankrolled this obtuse shite wouldn't throw five bucks at Flight of the Conchords.  Fuck you, NZFC, seriously.  Both thumbs down.


Picture
Black Mass (2015, Scott Cooper)
Sitting through this account of James 'Whitey' Bulger's personal shortcomings was like being dunked in a bucket of muddy water and sloshed around, bumping into stuff like Depp in crusty prosthetics again, Joel Egerton's squinty mugging while the XXXL supporting cast flails with you, often valiantly, in a mass of pointless, sluggish reiteration.  The dull palette unwittingly reflects the played-out nature of the material, from the deeply cliché-humping script to the makeweight murder sequences that underscore just how tawdry such an existence must be and prompts one to ponder all this scribal fascination with these skanky and vacuous hoods.

​The Bulger story is beset with challenges to successful adaptation; scungy parochial settings, stunted unsightly protagonists and tedious procedures etc., but 
Black Mass's biggest problem is the fact that it doubles down on that DGAF material with a shoegazing treatment.  Scorsese understands the breathless point of his own gangster voyeurism; Cooper seemed to miss it altogether, even in the midst of some brow-raising plagiarism.  If it was gritty authenticity he was going after why the hell did he tap Johnny the Homeless Santa, who's about as gangster as his BFF Marilyn 'lol Brian' Manson?  Our minds boggled in unison.

Actorily, everyone else does an okay job but whether vanity or delusion induced Depp to accept this utterly remote and inapposite role is anyone's guess.  Shorn of his former beauty, comfy pirate cosplay or fucktacular Burtonian staging, his inability to project much more than canned tics past that old man drag is laid pretty bare.  Were there really no other, more appropriate candidates?  Whatever.  Black Mass was overlong, overpopulated, overly into itself and fucking unrewarding.
Picture

* I'm sorry, but they just weren't very good.  Other stuff was.  More Hostile Witness Review  *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Sicario, Everest.

28/1/2016

 
Picture
Sicario (2015, Denis Villeneuve)
I was crossing all the toes and fingers in anticipation of this one.  Sadly, Sicario isn’t as good as you’ve probably heard, which gives me no pleasure.  If it had preserved the clean procedural tension of the opening half hour we would have been fine, but from the moment the camera started to linger on an overkill number of corpses decomposing behind drywall a cheesy, manipulative flavour kicked in and it was a downhill drag from there.  Sigh.  Emily Blunt is Kate, FBI SWAT boss battling southern-state drug cartel activity sucked into a murky, border-busting Special Ops initiative by Josh Brolin's CIA spook, who is in turn facilitating the mysterious Alejandro (Benico Del Toro) in some sort of personalised revenge trajectory wherein their interests more or less align.  

If the utterly depraved dynamics of the continental American drug war are really news to you, Sicario might possess more of the galvanic momentum it was obviously striving for.  In lieu of that shock value we both felt it offered little in the way of novel perspective or characterisation to relieve that sense of no-shit-sherlock redundancy.  It stumbles from the moment it veers away from impersonal momentum into the organisms involved, defying logic and resorting to laboured misogynistic diminution to make its feeble point.

Josh Brolin's CIA guy is the self-regarding median douche he always brings to the fucking table, which was annoying.  But it's Emily Blunt who really made me want to kick the screen.  Blunt has never sold me anything; as the Young Victoria she couldn’t even stand there in a fucking dress without pissing me off with that complacent duckface.  She is too static, too leaden, too self-conscious and projects all three deficits here as the FBI agent with an er… heart of naive gold.  Despite her character riding the pointy end into contra-cartel action on the daily, she remains a delicate principled flower, apparently, requiring male protection and supervision at every juncture.  Not since Jason Bourne has someone seemed so utterly fucking baffled by their own trajectory but you know… bitches be crazy.  The story so palpably aches to trail breathlessly after the macho Del Toro, wrong’d, ambiguous antihero, that Blunt’s hapless nark feels as superfluous and derisory to the audience as she does to her fellow protagonists.  Benicio is mmmgood but I wish someone would really twist his arm and make him work all that recessed potential.

I can see why generic male critics creamed their pants over 
Sicario. ​It’s everything they want movies to be- sneakily androcentric, essentially uncomplicated whilst affecting complexity, technically praiseworthy, vaguely familiar (it rips chunks out of Zero Dark Thirty and even The Usual Suspects with gay abandon) and reductively cynical.  

Picture
It could also be argued that it's a racist portrayal of a demonstrably stateless scourge, its lip service to the grim equity of violence on both sides overridden by a juvenile, forked-tongued insistence on the true form of the beast, which seems to hable español.  

Visually Sicario is sharp, diverting and moderately creative, though I had an issue with its rendering of the penultimate action in alt. spectrums because that shit was budget.  It may be worth watching but that's not much consolation when one considers just what might have been.


Picture
Everest  (2015, Baltasar Kormákur) 
Even if you're profoundly disinterested in the technical achievement it represents, Everest's fantastically pin-sharp and gin-clear cinematography is the best reason to watch this otherwise pretty standard disaster/survivor yarn dramatising portions of Rob Hall and Scott Fischer's fatal 1996 expeditions.  That, and Jason (Zero Dark Thirty) Clarke, who I had no fucking idea was Australian although that does explain his decent Newzullindish (not sure why our idiom seems to defeat virtually everyone; it's just a flattened affect, off-British variant, ff's.)  He is committed, buyable and engaging as the doomed Hall, as is Jake Gyllenhaal, who always delivers when relieved of the lead.  Then there's Josh Brolin, who always brings the Josh Brolin, no matter what.

Disappointingly, it is the consistently awesome Emily Watson who shits the tonal bed with her cringeworthy accent and overwrought fretting although, to be fair, Keira Knightley really takes the sloppy hysterics cake; thankfully she is relegated to smallish servings.  And that's all there is to Everest, really.  Don't go in expecting Tolstoy and you might find it moderately diverting.  

I'll award a consolation gold star for the eschewal of cheap pain-porn and stupidly villainous characterisations in its handling of a multi-axial tragedy that attracts vituperative revisionism and partisan dick-waving to this day.  Having read a number of opposing narratives, Everest doesn't seem like a particularly outrageous distortion to me, but then I find the whole concept of scrabbling over sacred mountains monstrously egotistical and deeply offensive.  Sorry.

*   More Hostile Witness Film Review   *


Monday slash Tuesday slash Montage of Heck slash the ancient guts of the dead volcano underneath our house.

19/1/2016

 
But first.
Picture

​That feels better.
Picture
I have said this before but we really do live on top of an old volcano; if a volcano can be said to have a cake hole, our house is sitting on its tonsils, basically.

I think these are vesicular 'a'a formations but I'm probably wrong because I don't know shit about lava.  These conglomerates live at the foot of the cliff over the road from our house and are being very slowly tongued to death by Sawyers Bay.  

​Oh well.  There are worse ways to go.
Speaking of ancient history, we got round to watching Montage of Heck after deferring it for so long.  I've talked about Cobain before, but whatever.  MoH was good, a really seamless blend of live shit and animation, faithful to the times and impeccably sourced if hard to watch and a little too easy on Kurt.

What a honking piece of human bird lime Courtney Love was/is, poisoned and poisoning, mediocre in every respect except her appetite for attention which was, to give credit where it's due, pretty fucking awe-inspiring.
Picture
Picture
I have met a dozen Courtneys in my time- male, female, variously horrific in their fathomless entitlement and depraved modi.  I've met some Kurts, too, those darkly shiny human wonders, so exceptional and so deeply fucked, at once violently infantile and hyper-evolved and just fucking impossible to deal with.  People give him a pass because they either don't know or forget that no one can make them do a tiny sliver of any shit they're not inclined to.  

​His parents sucked, if that's news to anyone, and beyond what was revealed in MoH, too.
Picture
I was struck by the extent to which Wendy (the nominal mother) resembled Courtney, both in their auto-dramatising  self-excusing bullshit and rode-hard physicality.  The way they both just shrug at their own catastrophic failures; such snaky protagonists appropriating passivity when it suited them makes me want to kick them across the room so fucking hard.  But in the end, Cobain was a dick about a lot of things and it really was all on him.  As much as I understand recourse to habitual narcotics, it's hard to defend people who decide to procreate and then go back to jamming that dirty shit into their arms.  Even if the people who were supposed to love him greased the wheels, he probably knew that better than anyone involved.  Black diamonds like Cobain outsmart themselves along with everyone else.    

Give Montage of Heck a spin when you get a chance.  It's probably a better prospect sans all that initial hype.
Picture
Think I might do part II of the holiday post this week, but I haven't written it yet so ummm yep.

*   Selected Ravings   *   Photoessays- me speak with colours mmm good   *   Some other shit   *


Hostile Witness Film Review Recent Documentary Rodeo

3/12/2015

 
It's December already and the struggle to avoid meaningful human interaction intensifies.  Everyone knows holidays are oversold shite, so why not stay home and watch something that won't compromise your IQ with a fucking bag of chips or something?  Works for us.
​
Picture
AMY (2015, Asif Kapadia) 
Chronicles Winehouse’s enormous talent, shitty fam,  joie de vivre, unfortunate susceptibilities and tragically attenuated life in compelling detail.  Superb in every respect and mandatory viewing.  Fandom strictly optional, which is always the test of a great documentary.  I would just say that anyone unlucky enough to have dealt with addiction or lost a loved one to either drugs or ED will find this a fairly harrowing and horribly familiar experience, so please approach with caution.  Stunning, tho.

Picture
Dior and I (2015 Frédéric Tcheng)  
Lovely to look at and smooth as a length of good habotai silk but also verrrry much in line with the fashion industry’s view of itself i.e. 
hautement expérimentée, exclusivity, bankable tortuousness etc. and therefore not especially interesting in itself beyond the beauteous visuals.  There’s still enough here for anyone wanting a gander at Raf Simons, the creative / constructive process and the atelier system, but I was left wanting a bit more substance; a bit of fucking critique wouldn't have gone astray either.

Picture
The Emperor’s New Clothes (2015 Michael Winterbottom)
The Russell Brand/Winterbottom antiglobalisation/inequity polemic is a nice place to start for anyone wanting a friendly practical overview of the results of the financial crisis and batshit cannibal capitalism.  Even if you personally would like to beat Brand with a studded switch for all his hamfisted attentionwhoring, there’s no point shooting the messenger when the communique is sound.  Preaches to the converted but not as bad as we expected; worth a look when you’ve got nothing else on.

Picture
All of Me (2014 Alexandra Lescaze)
Witness the Austin chapter of the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance’s struggle with the new scope of, and emphasis on, the obesity that is so intrinsic to its members’ identities.  A homely, humanist, non-exploitative investigation that allows those living with overweight to voice their own private struggles amid an increasingly confused clamour in the popular media.  Everyone should see this for a hundred different reasons.

Picture
Artifact (2013 Bartholomew Cubbins)
Much-touted exposé of the financial and legal assaults faced by faux-emo outfit Thirty Seconds to Mars.  And virtually everyone else in the commercial music and creative industries.  We loathe Jared Leto and don’t give a dry fuck if he’s beggared by Virgin/EMI, but their point stands, it is fairly well delineated here and civilians need to know this shit.  Still heavily marred by Leto’s oozing vanity and punchability; generators of intellectual property should probably avoid for the sake of their stroke risk.

Picture
The Armstrong Lie (2013 Alex Gibney)
We’ve watched this four times now and are still gobsmacked by both Lance’s brass-necked sociopathy and former fanboy Gibney’s utter blindness to its pervasive monstrosity, but kudos to the latter for outing his own worshipful bullshit.  The fascination hinges on Armstrong’s viperish exploitation of seemingly everyone around him vs the public image he was still so able to project, and why so many people were so loathe to accept his reality.  You don’t have to follow or even understand team sports to profit from The Armstrong Lie’s mightily valuable insights.  As good as it could be given the icky nature of the beast.

Picture
That Sugar Film (2015 Damon Gameau)
While That Sugar Film boasts far more Damon Gameau and his lensfucking partner than we were ultimately comfortable with and cribs shamelessly from Spurlock’s Supersize Me, it does manage to communicate many of the problems posed by sugar in the Western diet to the naive audience for which it was presumably intended.  Anyone past the WTF how many teaspoons? stage in their journey to enlightenment will probably find it as basic as we did.  Highlight: the half-Mountain Dew yokel and his intensely satisfying dental comeuppance (sadists only).

Picture
About Face: Supermodels Then and Now (2013 Timothy Greenfield-Sanders) 
​What is it like to be a collection of fetishised angles?  To depend on them for financial and psychological security?  To be so blessed and inevitably betrayed by that ambiguous currency?  About Face won’t change your life but some of these hot bitches drop wisdom we can all profit from. Not as hagiographic nor mindless as we expected.


Picture
20 Feet from Stardom (2013 Morgan Neville)
​Excellent account of the backup singers’ lot in an industry renowned for its shameless appropriation and cruelty.  Extremely well-executed, heaving with righteous archival stuff and affecting reportage from the women in question, so long overlooked and exploited.  Highly recommended.

Picture
Inside Job (2010 Charles Ferguson)
​The definitive OG account of the 2008 economic fuck fest and the astonishingly comprehensive international sleaze that is still romping on unchecked.  We don't understand how Ferguson's team got so many of the greedy psychopaths involved to outline their malfeasance on camera but suspect that's just a depressing insight into their smirking impunity.  If you are going to sit through any of the numberless post mortems, give Inside Job your iTunes dollar and reward its discipline and daring.

*   More Hostile Witness Film Review   *   Selected Ravings   *


Monday slash Tuesday: The Walking Dead slash notional penis slash industrial diorama

3/11/2015

 
Picture
I swear we were not responsible for this jeu d'esprit (pictured above) inscribed on a road guard on the way to Sawyer's Bay and I do not necessarily endorse the sentiment, except in exchange for jewellery and/or the prospect of social advancement. 
Ha ha!  Only half-joking!  But in all seriousness, I do think more penises should find their way into a greater selection of mouths and perhaps spend more time there as a general principle.  We're all sick of hearing from idle mouths, and an idle penis is the devil's plaything.  Buttplug, probably, if christians are to be believed (they aren't).

Or perhaps we should pair this contentious organ with a more contemporary menace and say a bored cock is the devil's iPhone; I feel okay saying that out loud since I don't think Apple and Satan are exactly on the DL anymore.  They're out and proud.


Anyway.  Do you love that there is a boat called African Quail > as much as we do?

​Let's take in a few of the Port scenes we've snapped recently with the wee pocket Canon while I complain to you about rubbish television.  We stayed in this All Hallows eve and exposed ourselves to the first series of 
The Walking Dead, largely because I was tired of hearing about it in absentia.
Picture
Picture
If nothing else, it reminded us why we're not fans of the zombie horde scenario.  Its intrinsic limitations are so difficult to write around, especially in a sustained manner.  For one, there's the backstory issue- in my humble opinion, you should either go hard, creative and compelling with the particulars of your disaster, or don't bother explaining at all.  Nada.  Just keep it zipped.  Anything in between, as per TWD, is just rank, stinky expediency.  Then there's the general high v low-functioning conundrum; zombies must always be dumber than your survivors, so in order to present median, broadly relatable (lol euphemisms) characters, you have to relegate anyone exceptional or interesting and grind your situational parameters hard into the dirt, resulting in dipshit protagonists and a really static, window-licking horde.  Which then means you then have to stunt like a drunk clown to keep all those sludgy elements moving.  Do you love an almost total reliance on deus ex machina?  We hate that shit.
Picture
So after someone shot a kid we didn't care about through a deer we really liked early on in Season 2, we hit the kill switch in a welter of boredom and general irritation.

Maybe it gets better, but the fundamentals were just too fucking annoying.  Verdict: 
The Walking Dead is boring.  Visually budget.  Repetitive (in a bad way) even within the first series.  And heaving with survivors we couldn't give a rat's arse about. 

That's another fatal problem with the zombie scenario.  It requires us to make the increasingly pointless distinction between the deadened living and the living dead.  In a world already stuffed to the gills with grunting, shuffling oxygen thieves, what's the point of a viral apocalypse?  

Personally, I could see myself seizing a weapon and going violently collateral five seconds after the first person complained about phone reception.  Come on now- what's the first and/or only thing a standard suburban twat would miss?  Not their fucking photo albums.  In trying to dignify its dishwater survivors (and thereby flatter its audience), 
The Walking Dead is wilfully stupid and laughably dishonest.  I know it's just a zombie yarn but we both know it wants to be taken seriously so yeah- they should have tried harder.
Picture
(A side note to oversensitives- TWD gave me a dose of horrid, persistent synaesthetic psycho-murk that's hanging around like an olive green algal bloom stuck to the inside of my skin. You might want to avoid it altogether if you're susceptible.)​
​
Onsite this week- proooobably something local and scenic.  Unless I have a better idea between now and Wednesday.  You'll be 
the first to know.

* I've just noticed that some of the translation links in the onsite Book had dropped out so I've been through and reinstated them all.  Please feel free to let me know if you find bung links. I apologise on behalf of the recent updates.*

*   Random Link   *   Kitchen Bitch   *   Pretty Flowers   *   Lipstick   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Madame Bovary, San Andreas, Southpaw.

29/10/2015

 
Picture
Madame Bovary  (2014, Sophie Barthes)
In many ways, life really is an Unlikable Olympics, wherein every stripe of twat and derp gets in your face, and then you die.  Flaubert was right about that, and about us largely being volunteers in our own tours of miserable duty, but I flip flop as to Madame Bovary’s absolute entitlement to canonical status and am thusly unusually amenable to the arguments posed by each new interpretation.

Which leads me to ponder why anyone would take such a blunt set of hedge shears to some of MB’s most important elements, recklessly isolating its characterisations and setting them adrift presumably in the pursuit of… brevity?  Economy?  Dunno.  It’s not the kind of arc that can be topped and tailed; MB is like a longbow, the power of its draw dependant on the integrity of its whole.  I’ll leave the precise nature of the omissions for you to discover, but I’m still struggling to understand the point of this Rose Barreneche/Sophie Barthes edit and its cropping of that fatal curve.

So much rested on Mia Wasikowska’s portrayal and while her paintbox of low-fi pretty and naturalistic tics and grimaces is a good start, it is largely the recipe she presented in Fukunaga's Jane Eyre and I'm not sure these two ladies share much more than pinched viscera.  The guys are unspectacular.  I don’t get Paul Giamatti’s weirdly atonal inclusion as mouth-and-trousers Homais.  Lloyd-Hughes forms an okay husband out of the reduced material he was handed and Logan Marshall-Green as posh cad/budget Tom Hardy rendered himself essentially pointless by turning in something closer to rising damp than callous smoulder.  Ezra Miller looks too much like someone way too into Ezra Miller and that shit is distracting.  Rhys Ifans is captain obvious as the procurer of ruinous luxury, but then that’s all he ever does.

Picture
Technically and artistically MB is successful enough, even if it succumbs to that wilting crop of recent visual conventions afflicting middlebrow period drama; uninspired natural light, self-conscious handcam etc.  Costumes and art direction knew their business and deserve particular notice for their en pointe service of the story, coaxing us along with Emma in her pursuit of beauty and distinction.  It's pretty and tasteful but also coy and boring.

As a misanthropist it’s difficult for me to accept this demotion of Madame Bovary’s exquisitely-wrought and utterly merciless arraignments in favour of sloppy, brumous womance.  It leaves the heart of the beast on the cutting room floor in favour of modest performances and undistinguished observation and I'm not sure the world needed another stunted vanilla rendition.


Picture
San Andreas (2015, Brad Peyton)
Dude.  There's like these science people and they, I don’t know, detect shit and they’re detecting lots of whatever that shit is and like all this stuff happens something something faulty, and then earthquaking, like, everything in California is fucked because it's the superquake, the one where California just like goes boom into the Atlantic or some shit and there’s this other science guy and he’s on that... that dam, you know, the old one, you know, that really big one, and then there's the earthquake, right and that shit is just gone like boom, then The Rock has a hot daughter and she gets totally wet huh huh huh yeah I'd let her suck it brah, and his wife is like, on this building that is going down and needs rescuing and then they get this boat and go all the way up a tsunami totally and after that they just like cruise through all these other people needing help but its fine because it’s their daughter and she’s with these randoms and she says all this shit about what to like, do but hey lucky her dad’s there.  

​It's an earthquake movie.  There were few-to-no expectations.  But even recreational drug use could not and did not make San Andreas right, and I don’t say that lightly.  Especially cretinous cinematic floaters like this one always make me nervous because I feel they really are reflective of the ambient human plasm, and that sluggish corpus does not typically respond well to ridicule.  Incidentally, it was almost interesting to witness the two weirdly insistent and creepily prescriptive gender models San Andreas presented.  Millennial Girlpower Exemplar can know things, but must repay that indulgence with tittays, hypercoloured eyeballs, scrupulously polite accessibility and ultimate helplessness.  Her mother can only hope for guidance from her Conventional Retrograde Patriarkhēs and his powerful ocean-besting righteousness. 

No stars.  Please leave your physics in the foyer for collection prior to event.


Picture
Southpaw (2015, Antoine Fuqua)
From the moment Jake busted out all that bug-eyed mugging in that generic Vegas ring, I knew which way this thing was headed despite the initial industry buzz.  Gyllenhaal is such a naughty pony; though we often enjoy his performances, he has highly questionable, even wilfully bad taste in projects, regularly plunging from the heights of Donnie Darko and Nightcrawler into steamy poos like this one.

Jake is Billy the heavyweight champion who came up hard; his supportive wife, loving daughter and luxe estate complete him.  But oh no- at the top of his game he loses it all- no one understands his pain, the man came took his money and shitty Fitty took his game.  He cries alone in the shower.  Tragic strings enclose him.  Helpful voiceovers delineate the skullfuckingly obvious, over and over again.  Billy must re… rebuild.

Had enough?  We’d had enough after five minutes.  I may be old/ not the target demo/ have seen this retarded parable twenty times elsewhere, but I'm also as bloodthirsty and immature as the next punter and yet Southpaw's mouthbreathing spectacle still insults and displeases me.  And leaves me wondering things like just how Rachel McAdams and Gyllenhaal could sort through a presumably dizzying array of projects then settle on this one?  Why did Forest Whitaker pack his dignity when he knew he’d never get to wear it?  Perhaps it suffices to say that this was originally intended as a vehicle for Marshall Mathers.  Yes- Eminem, who recused himself only because his lyrical muse just wouldn't let him be great as a totally convincing heavyweight boxing champion and dragged him away in mid-shoot to write another stunning opus.  Sure, Jan.

Southpaw looks somewhat expensive while managing to feel like it was shoplifted from the Two Dollar Store by hoodrats.  Every fucking genre cliché is dragged screaming let me die in peace from overdue retirement and stuffed into a narrative bucket wherein they writhe like greasy, tormented eels to no good purpose.  There is.  A fight training.  Montage.  The incessant didactic commentary made me want to punch myself in the fucking face repeatedly.  The thing rolls ponderously over the top of the talent that may have redeemed it even though there are a thousand obvious ways this jejune orgy could have been tilted or reframed to make it worthy.  McAdams is excused; she acquits herself even in this blighted context, as do most of the supporting players, but it's only when he's sat with the utterly reliable Whitaker that Gyllenhaal reminds us why we bother with him at all, alluding to just how circumstantial and reactive his magic seems to be.  Carby old Fifty Curtis Jackson Cent plays mediocre-shady exactly like someone who really has cheated a few dipshits out of their lunch money in his time on earth.  Golf clap?  

It's fucking horrible.  We laughed like ghouls and rolled around in agony all the way through this feckless shitfest whilst simultaneously mourning those two squandered hours.

*  More Hostile Witness Film Review   *  Read the Book   *   Selected Ravings  *


Monday slash Tuesday: Whiney boredom & True Detective Season 2

5/8/2015

 
0_0


It's been a very basic week of dull weather and random injuries and day-long morning stares.  The Lovely R smashed the ever living shit out of his thumb whilst putting together a new gate and I put my back out like a big old cull cow.  So we've been sitting around hitting the landrace hard and going ow and complaining and my mind is pretty empty of shit worth writing down.  
Picture
But when has that ever stopped me?  Caution: the following may be garbled.

We have been watching season II of True Detective.  I had a casual-to-complex relationship with the first series i.e. nonplussed by universal moans of critical pleasure despite all the jumbo-sized shortcomings but impressed by Nic Pizzollato at least trying something stylistically and somewhat in earnest.  Which confuses me because I see exactly the same jumbo shortcomings in this new series while the public response seems so diametric this time around.  Scary to think that novelty can be such a driver of perception. 

Like I said, despite its many flaws I don't hate-hate TD2 and don't feel the need to drag it as hard as other commentators.  Squandered casts and subcutaneous misogyny are so fucking ubiquitous that their discussion feels passé at this juncture, so I'll just go straight to the arse-puckering dialogue and wondering aloud how that shit makes it through what are usually tortuous and overpopulated editorial, rehearsal and directorial processes.  

Fundamentally I just don't get why so many writers struggle with dialogue.  A viable character always speaks for themselves and that's all there is to it.  While you could justifiably conclude that Pizzollato's never conversed with an adult human female, he is obviously talented and his instincts are sound.   It's just that his most profound and deeply passionate observations so often flounder in the mouths of his human creations.  His stuff is Batman in reverse- all real places and intelligent ideas but so few definitive protagonists.  I fucking loathe Mathew McConaughey's oxygen-gobbling cymbal-banging and though he got all the damn credit, it was the soupy lowland ambiance, the stinky majesty of TD1, so instinctive and well chosen, that provided placental support for those moments of stunningly poetic truth about death and loss when he almost killed them with his bullshit, breathing for them, salvaging their integrity.  I appreciated these narrative pearls to the extent that my admiration has outlived the memory of the words involved and the pompous clunk of their delivery.  
Picture
TD2 assures me that is probably a merciful omission.  We can, I think, throw some blame at the cast.  Taylor Kitsch looks like he's perpetually gambling with a wet fart but there's something uniformly alimentary about all of their deliveries and that's a directorial problem.  Vince Vaughn is a bream-faced one-expression mofo who couldn't sell me a straight line if both our lives depended on it, and he's allowed to squeeze his utterances past something hard and overdue like a constipated sybil.  Colin strains manfully enough to give us a whiff of for-real crazy skid mark, Rachel comes at it from the other end with some cocksucker strep-throat stylings and their performances carry the whole thing.  If the creative team (so tellingly overburdened with executive producers) were shooting for visceral, they ended up with brown splatter.

Pizzollato should probably also decide if he wants his evil to be cynical/rational/explicable or occult (in both senses of the word).  It's like he's always trying to wed the two strains without paying for the reception and that's cheesy and appropriative.  I wish he'd drop his detectives in a deeper hole because there is a point to be made and that is bad people are all the same colour no matter how they got that way.  

We could bitch about the baffling, undisciplined plotting but I think I'll just call that shit character driven, avoid eye contact and change the subject, lol.

It's not like we're going to quit watching 2/3s of the way through, though.  

Now I've shot my cognitive wad, so it'll probably be a lipstick review this week.  Oh go on- you like those too.  Soothing.  Sooooooooothing.


I fucking hate panflutes.



Monday slash Tuesday: My dog is always with me.  

8/7/2015

 
Picture
Wild at Heart. So stupid and threadbare and yet so utterly, comprehensively glorious in its chunk-blowing emotional impact and motherlode of gross eternal truths.  So many eternal truths are at least vaguely disgusting, don't you think?  Love is a negotiated chokehold and its exigence can be the most humiliating force on the planet; no real good can come of it.  There's always a whiff of Bobby Peru in the only kind of sex worth having; it doth liberally mock the meat it feeds on, making you a fucking slave to the slippery vagaries of genitalia- is that not the dumbest thing in the world and also seething with functional blerg?   

A lot of people were mad at WaH back in the day, waaaay out of proportion to any offence its artless dumbness should have inspired, which tipped me off to the real reason for the foaming at the mouth; all surrealist drag aside, Lynch (praise be upon him) was bitchslapping us with too much holistic, discomforting authenticity and that shit catches in a lot of perceptual windpipes.  Wild at Heart is the feral, airless passion, the witless devotion and the trip to the clinic afterwards.  They don't make them like that any more.

Picture
I first saw it with someone more Sailor than Sailor and it reminds me of him, always fondly, sometimes agonisingly, but he would have hated to be the cause of my avoiding an earthly delight and so I watch the damn thing anyway and am always glad I did.

Laura Dern was so great as Lula and never gets any credit for what was a fantastically instinctive performance- brittle, unfortified, slutty and stainless, the like of which we almost never see in these dry times with all the meta-meta bullshit and watchful posing that latterly passes for performance.  Dern extruded Lula from her own darn flesh. You need to stand in front of a mirror and try it yourself in order to truly appreciate her achievement.

Twenty five years.  Wild at Heart stomps that time down into an arm's length, so that it just seems like the distance between you and the overloaded ashtray into which you flicked your Camel, back when you still smoked.  It reminds me to fuck and to be fucked, to embrace intoxication in all its many forms, and that my beard-scissors hairdo is a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom.


Hostile Witness Film Review: Birdman, Exodus: Gods & Kings, A Most Violent Year

19/6/2015

 
Picture
Birdman (Alejandro González Iñárritu, 2014) 
So, Birdman.  A visual ouroboros, an infinity loop through the muertos colours, infernal passages and moments of surreal exultation that is the neurotic middle aged mind and its buckshot-tattered ego.  There is so much muscular excellence to recognise and ponder.  Stunningly ambulatory direction and a welter of technical superlatives?  Check.  Chowder-chunky script?  Passive-aggressive obscurity and incisive performance?  Yep.  Interesting fuzzy demarcation and a shitload of surgical-grade intergenerational metacritique?  Super grown-up admissions about the shabby unspoken pointlessness and delusionality of it all?  In spades.  But also- heavy overworking, glutinous staginess, rubber band fatigue from all that visual flow and, for me personally, a certain verbose chewiness largely centred around Keaton's part because his acting has always rubbed me wrong. 

Nevertheless, as a writer I bend the knee to any script that can make helpless, squirming subjects of such a self-regarding cast.  It is a fucking beast of a thing, applied with the kind of gobsmacking assurance that makes everything else you've seen lately look fragile and equivocal and christ, I love to see that.  Last night as the credits popped I felt a little assaulted and decided I was impressed but unmoved; on mature reflection, there is so much multifactorial accomplishment in Birdman that it doesn't matter if you're unresponsive to its inhabitants.  It probably works best as a commentary even if that's not all that was intended.  It is a spectacular achievement and we need a lot more of this shit.  See it, support it.


Picture
Exodus: Gods & Kings  (Ridley Scott, 2014)
Oh Christian Bale.  I love thee well but you done fucked up by taking that cheque.  Everything you heard about this gigantic pendulous fupa of a thing is true; the monolithic multilateral offensiveness, new and exotic forms of hammery (intentional and unintentional) inexplicable miscasting (quite apart from the blatant racism of their selections, also- Joel Edgerton: ha ha); I could go on until you begged me to stop.  Bad design and art direction always bunch my undies and Exodus is a comprehensive craft fail on top of all that conceptual scatology, heaving with anachronistic props, ridiculous wardrobe, horrific makeup, cheesy, uneven effects, and the wrong horses, dammit.  In short, a complete disregard for the incredible cultural and aesthetic achievements of Egyptian civilisation.  

Which fits right in with its next level-embarrassing spirit of tastelessness and appropriation, running the spectrum from generalised brownface to lifting sequences wholesale from 300 (there are some breathtaking moments of plagiarism).  Scott’s frankly inexplicable doting on his own material (who the fuck quotes Gladiator with a straight face?) is also in evidence, underscoring precisely what sort of blithe narcissism is at work here.  That someone with their head stuffed so firmly up their arse could miss the ineffable brown coating their own output is a mystery for the ages.  Go home, Ridley- you're drunk.

I should have resisted the urge to spectate this bollocks.  I loathe christianity.  It's all just a good crop of potatoes waiting to happen as far as I'm concerned, and I'm reminded by toxic tripe like Exodus that the obsessive cruelty and gloating relativism of organised religion is never more succinctly limned than in the very legends that it treasures.  So if you're looking to wean yourself off that shit, brave the genital-numbing boredom and treat yourself to this hot, stinky slice of no-star Mosaic realness.  If you're still religious, call me at home.


Picture
A Most Violent Year  (J C Chandor, 2014)
A Most Violent Year reminded me that both Issac and Chastain probably went to very expensive performing arts schools.  Like, constantly.  Their slightly malfeasant NYC fuel oil distributors circa 1981 were so thickly redolent of their credentials that I had difficulty distinguishing this thing from some sort of advanced performance module, and from that observation you can possibly guess the trifling nature of my response.  The film is fascinatingly academic to the point of perversity, eschewing lowbrow hooks like its fucking life depended on it.  We should indulge this kind of wilfulness when it is serving up the good shit (see Birdman), but AMVY didn’t feed me much more than highly polished collegiate exposition; it swung and missed.  

That’s the danger of staging a piece with such narrow, parochial specificity.  A premise that offers so few intrinsic attractions can only ever be what you make of it, and in this case that is: not enough.  The characters are not adequately delineated.  There is a puzzling blindness to successful, organic emphasis, something I've seen so often lately and in a bunch of really disparate films.  I know they’re trying to be all angular and challenging but it just feels like a string of missed marks.  And so wilfully difficult becomes charmless, murky, period off-noir, pulling focus onto the mechanics of performance in lieu of the sleight and glamour of successful characterisation.  Both leads go the distance with the kind of sheer force of will and projection that should have sold me their characters a hundred times over.  Still no dice.

There are moments of masterful framing and diggable flow.  I appreciated the even handed spread of authentic sleaze.  But (and I've complained about this before) can we please give the nicotine stain filters a big fucking rest?  Why, when we sit down to something 20th C, do we have to look at it through fucking yellow cellophane?  A Most Violent Year isn't unreconstructed shite by any means; just don't expect to be enthralled or transported.

*   More film review   *   Selected Ravings   *   Read the Book onsite   *


Hostile Witness Film Review Recent Release Rodeo: Nightcrawler, Dirty Wars, The Imitation Game.

16/4/2015

 
Picture
NIGHTCRAWLER   (Dan Gilroy, 2014)  While contempt doesn't begin to describe my reaction to what masquerades as dramatic social commentary these days, there is just so much dingy misanthropic gold in Nightcrawler that all notions of voyeurism are subverted.  Jake Gyllenhaal and his tadpole stare are Lou, the low-ball sociopath who takes up chasing lurid footage on spec for local LA news stations (if it bleeds, it leads etc), accompanied by Rick, his hapless apprentice.  As his professional stock rises Lou butts heads with veteran rival Bill Paxton and courts Rene Russo's Nina, sleazy editor and principle client, until his drive to capture footage shifts from the reactive to the creative.  

That none of what devolves feels particularly outlandish is a pretty effective indictment of our prevailing reality and while Nightcrawler is a critique, Gilroy is canny enough to impose hypnotic choreography on all that yucky verité, keeping everything tightly kinetic and smoothly lineal in the process of crafting reportage into fable.  The nocturnal vehicular footage rewards both the action gourmand and the technical/aesthetic connoisseur and we appreciated the contrast drawn between the drab banality of violence and its conflation into monetised spectacle.  In fact, we appreciated most of what Nightcrawler was shovelling.

Picture
I have time for Gyllenhaal because he (more often than not) rewards indulgence with the kind of off-kilter shit that he pulls here, although in absolutely nailing a supporting turn that could have gone so very wrong, Riz Ahmed almost jacks his thespy thunder.  Paxton brings a lot of... standard Paxton, and I can't decide how I feel about Russo's numbed Nina; she did good without knocking me out of my shoes, and that was all that was really required.  Brief moments of uneven tonality are the thing's only real defect, the ultimate scene striking us as a bit of glib disappointment after the stunningly angular catharsis that precedes it.  But don’t let this deter you; if Nightcrawler leaves you feeling like you’ve been licking tar, it has a point, and you won’t be able to drag your eyeballs off it.


Picture
DIRTY WARS  (Richard Rowleycor, 2013)  Despite its generic title and relative lack of fanfare, Dirty Wars sets itself apart in a genre obsessed with embedded access by mining the sinister lack of scrutiny enjoyed by one of the American military's most reprehensible tentacles, JSOC, or Joint Special Operations Command.  If that sounds like an acronym you couldn't satirise, the reality as explored by veteran war journalist Jeremy Scahill will wipe that cynic's smirk right off your face.   From Afghanistan to Yemen and Somalia, Scahill's poignant attempts to penetrate JSOC's truly terrifying political and operational impunity and to make sense of the horrific scale and limitless scope of their arbitrary carnage comprises a profoundly moving and disturbing experience.  Beautifully filmed under terrible conditions, thoughtfully constructed and deeply personal, Dirty Wars benefits greatly from its human pulse, dismantling distance and objectification to unite us with those at the opposite end of a process that victimises us all.  Mandatory viewing.


Picture
THE IMITATION GAME   (Morten Tyldum, 2014) For a biopic, The Imitation Game sure as hell knew how to ballroom dance around a subject without ever making meaningful contact.  Most literate adults are already aware of the whole Alan Turing / Enigma encryption / gay and persecuted / Bletchley Park milieu blah blah etc. etc., and if you number amongst them, don't expect to be goosed with any stunning insights or novel interpretations.  Or moistened by gobsmacking performances; for once, the paucity of heavyweight gongs afforded TIG (despite the relentless campaigning) hinted at method behind the fillum establishment's madness, and it's my opinion that the adapted screenplay Oscar was massively undeserved.  In trying to scrutinise such highly unconventional personalities and their accomplishments through plain vanilla goggles, this movie squandered such an amazing critical mass of historic material that I'm as much saddened as annoyed.

Picture
It's just too low-functioning.  And never grows legs, staggering all over the place breaking shit in the attempt, welding a mass of laughably stock characters, clichéd assumptions about gender and sexuality and a dirty-windscreen view of history into something lumpen, pointlessly fractured and even sort of amorphously offensive.  From the drippy private school scenes of romantic awakening to Alan's streaking away from his problems across a field of dewy Englishness, The Imitation Game just felt like a gently wafted, scone-scented Cumbercentric fart, with a side of Kiera Knightley as Kiera Knightley: privileged vintage crumpet. You might have guessed by now that I'm not down with either Knightley or Benedict's shtick, but I like to think of that prejudice as something deeply rooted in their respective creative realities.  That the latter was medium-competent in 12 Years a Slave just underlines the embarrassing distance between Tyldum and Steve McQueen.  Thumbs down.

*   More Hostile Witness Film Review   *   Photoessays   *   Best of the Blog   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Whiplash ( Damien Chazelle, 2014)

12/3/2015

 
Picture
Whiplash.  A gifted jazz drummer attempts to negotiate the demands of an American university studio band, battling his father’s deadweight legacy, his own expectations and the punishing whims of a dictatorial instructor.

It’s a familiar scenario and not the kind of thing I would usually drag myself across town to see due to prejudices I will presently enumerate, but then, you know… universal acclaim, etc etc.  Is it good?  Yes and I have little hesitation in conceding that.  Did it deserve all those award noms?  Yes, and here comes the caveat- because most of them were technical.  From a technical POV, Whiplash should have slurped up every darn gong going because the photography was primo and the cut and flow were dense with the elegance and dynamism essential to the successful communication of so many non-visual elements.  The thing is paced with the kind of brilliantly reactive, staccato precision you might expect from a gifted musician, testament to the obviously polymathic vision of Chazelle- he penned + directed this off the back of his own experiences- and the tightarse talent of his crew.  There is very little narrative flab and the arc is okay as far as its conventionality allows.  Whiplash is a slick and solid view, I doubt you’ll regret your investment in its 106m minutes and I say that as someone who fucking hates jazz (at least the kind pursued herein). 

Picture
However.  Whiplash also made me seriously want to vandalise a place of learning.  My personal reaction to a flying chair from a peremptory instructor would comprise immediate cabinetry-based escalation, and if your respect for the judgements and hierarchies of a creative establishment are as deficient as mine, you’re not going to come in your pants over the dynamics detailed here, despite the bilateral nature of the struggle.  

Andrew the percussive arsehole is well documented and probably honestly intended.  But arseholes are like flint; ubiquitous, and whilst you’ll sometimes get a spark from knocking two of them together, you might just have known one too many of the buggers (talented and otherwise) to really care about this Andrew or his piano bar bête noire.  The flipside of that is my enduring distaste for the popular artist-as-tortured-douchecanoe trope, pandering to audience expectation and nourishing destructive notions about the talented- that they are somehow infernal, that marginalisation and exploitation are their due and even their masochistic intent.  Every artist feels that blowback to some extent. I may be oversensitive about that shit, but fuck, whatever, man.  *flips desk and storms out*

Picture
Neither Teller’s nor Simmons’ performances moved my sympathy or insight needle, despite the feting they’ve both enjoyed, the latter in particular serving up the kind of watchful, slightly greasy polish that slid a little bit past apposite and a few feet into stock.  Luckily they did more than enough to shade out Paul Reiser's droopy dad, because that shit was a cheap blot on the proceedings and god, just horribly cheesy.  Melissa Benoist's girl-as-garnish bit part was shiny and engaging and may have been even moreso had she been given enough to work with.  Should have been born a dude, I suppose.

Pecking at something so roundly praised can sound like pure contrarianism but Whiplash really isn't a glistening nugget of spotless perfection and it falls to the sturdy independent reviewer to point that out.  If it was reaching for a wee bit of subversion in the midst of all those band aids and sweaty deference, it ended up punking out, and for the worst reason- a tidy denouement, the restoration of an equilibrium without ever seriously questioning the value of that balance.  Which is why I regard it as something lying a little south of brilliant.  It did make me sit through a fucking lengthy freestyle drum solo, though, and for that reason alone I look forward to Chazelle's future work.

*   More film Review   *   Photoessay   *   Read the Book onsite   *   Best of the Blog   *


Hostile Witness Film Review Recent Release Rodeo: Snowpiercer, The Two Faces of January, American Sniper.

5/3/2015

 
Picture
SNOWPIERCER (Bong Joon-ho, 2013) 

Sounded promising, didn't it?  Unhappily, Snowpiercer is a really awful hackneyed, explosive techno-shart of a thing that just does not work, on any level, and reminded me why I've never been a fan of Mod Asian cinema's penchant for 'whimsical' arbitrary bullshit.  Did everyone else really enjoy SP as much as they publicly professed?  Insert Mugatu GIF here, because god damn, we passionately hated virtually everything about it.  From the incredibly lazy and I'm just going to say it, retarded, premise, the peanut-headed lead (Chris Evans, human adult contemporary station) an unbelievably ponderous and literal progression, the swishy sub-sub-Matrix, jazz-handed, violence-inducing violence and an unforgivably hammy Swinton, the thing schlumps along toward the kind of denouement that deserves dragging on a chain behind a car.  Oh but it's an allegory!  Like Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a fucking allegory.  

Don't believe the hype.  If you're even passingly familiar with/fond of the genre you'll find it neither challenging nor clever.  I'll say it again- whimsical arbitrary off-fucking-broadway panto effluent.  Study the screencap up there and tell me I'm wrong.  Look at the Swinton.  LOOK AT HER.  

We were both bored and angered.


Picture
THE TWO FACES OF JANUARY (Hossein Amini, 2013)
 
When their grift goes bad in 1960's Greece, two grand-touring shysters (Kirsten Dunst and Viggo Mortensen) find themselves reliant on another wayward American (Oscar Issac) to get them out of the country, their tenuous association tightening into a fatal tailspin.  TTFoJ is an arrestingly beautiful thing, to be sure, blessed with a top(ish) shelf cast, gilded locales, outstanding photographic and technical values.  It's also reassuringly adult, played out over a framework of grown-up tensions, potentials and frustrations, guile and desperation morphing into affinity and back again.  

All this should be a recipe for solid-state awesomeness but it's just too polite.  So much tasteful choreography in the face of everything we know about cornered people clawing at each other.  That's a genre issue as much as anything, as is The Two Faces of January being rather overly familiar, though I'm not one to kick at a flick for riffing on venerable themes or wearing honest homage on its sleeve.  Performance-wise, Dunst and Issac delight both the eye and the critical faculties, their entanglement offering a display of charisma and professionalism that spills out over the limitations of the material- always a pleasure to behold.  I was less sold on Mortensen's crusty instigator, but I often find Viggo a bit like a hermit crab poked once too often when he senses deficits in the material and have come to suspect this stubborn opacity is less the product of disinclination than (dare I suggest) creative insufficiency.  

It is an indictment of our current cinematic climate that something so six-out-of-ten/adequate outshines so much else.  TTFoJ exhibits few of the really penetrating personal quirks and twists that distinguish the blue ribbon stuff in this genre and upon which such distinction is so utterly dependent.  I felt very little in the course of my observation, the soft-focus genericism at work here unfortunately transcending the sum of its more decent elements.  And does everything circa the Bosphorous have to end in a dramatic foot chase through a jewellery quarter?  One more thing; Oscar Isaac is fucking dreamy.  The Two Faces of January is a honey-coloured num-num moderately deserving of your Sunday afternoon.


Picture
AMERICAN SNIPER (Clint Eastwood, 2014)  

The title says it all, really, doesn't it?  Uninspired, tone-deaf, witlessly pedestrian; if American Sniper was a puppy, it would crawl in a circle, not that such considerations would ever halt an oscar campaign.  

When precis tell you who they are, believe them: Kyle the Murican gets mad at all the spooky foreigners blowing up his homeland for no reason, dammit, joins the military, clips randoms from Iraqi rooftops and eventually catches one himself (did I spoil the ending for you?  Whilst children are apparently legitimate grist to the gratuitous sadism mill, Kyle's death-by-the-sword is discreetly veiled out of a respect accorded no one else.)  

But you don't have to wade through the politics to smell what's cooking here; this isn't (all) claw-handed liberal bitching and our audible recoil has probably obscured the fact that American Sniper is just a crap MOR movie, considered dispassionately.  Every lol cliché is dished out in an endless brown buffet; boring Hurt Locker-retread action, sinister bloodthirsty dirka-dirkastanis, horrifically inadequate interpersonal sequences and dipshit private imperatives that are a perfect microcosm of the wider political fuckfest.  Sienna Miller is neither recognisable nor memorable as the virtually nameless Standard Issue Home Incubator Unit.  Bradley Cooper serves up all the charmless, chook-eyed monotone a mouthbreather could wish for in their favourite homicidal simpleton.  And the whole thing looked like it was filmed through a fucking coffee filter by a team of Ambien-chugging nematodes on a really tight budget.

It may not sound like it, but I don't hate absolutely everything Eastwood does just because I suspect he's a pointlessly conservative arsehat gliding on a greasy slick of masculine privilege.  I had some time for Mystic River (in spite of everything) and still enjoy Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (with robust caveats), but they hung heavily, nay- exclusively- on individual performances and when you look at the rest of his efforts, American Sniper nestles right in the midst of the truckload of unsubtle bollocks he's been shovelling for a long time.  What we have here begins with thematic toxicity and ends with directorial fail.  

Clint the peekaboo jingoist is calling American Sniper an anti-war piece now.  Wonder if that's the kind of language he used to get it green-lit.  Conclusion- we watched it so you don't have to.

*   Had enough or do you want some more?   *   Best of the Blog   *   Read the Book onsite   *


Hostile Witness Film Review:  Under The Skin (2013 Jonathan Glazer)

11/11/2014

 
Picture
Sometimes the endless potential of strange fiction is a garden, rampant and fertile, and sometimes it is a featureless void, deprived even of convention’s drab landmarks.  That you see either one or the other is down to the eye of the beholder as much as the nature of the material presented, which is why critical judgements can be dismissed as subjective and even biased opinion.  Sometimes opacity and absence are intelligent devices and as welcome as any immediate, spectacular disclosure.  And then there’s those times when any single thing you can think to say about a story is an egregious spoiler… which to me is something that elbows past discretion and burps into your ear about fatal insubstantiality.  

I was so looking forward to Under The Skin that I was determined to ignore my own skeptisicm’s sardine breath and white knuckle it through any nagging preemptory suspicions.

Damn you, suspicion.  You’re so often right.  So spoiler alert; Scarlett Johansson is a nameless alien predator inhabiting a busty (is there any other kind?) earthgirl’s corpus.  That shouldn’t ruin the film for you, unless I then blurted out that’s all, folks, and rolled credits.  Which is what someone might as well have done twenty minutes into the thing because Under The Skin isn't really the piece of brilliantly-executed originality that I was sold, and this is obvious right from the stuttering opening sequence.

Picture
What is an Alien Scarlett to do?  She roams with a purpose, walking around on her hind legs, taking jerky notice of her new incarnation, finding all the onboard buttons.  She is abetted in securing human meat for a devouring plasm by a number of silent companions, using the crude mechanics of desire to secure her victims and inviting us to contemplate the circular universality of predation, the ugly relativity of morality and the visitant experience.  

All of which would be fine things indeed if Alien Scarlett could offer much to our scrutiny.  I suppose she looks a bit wonky when wide-angled from below, and lipstick application is an arcane thing, but little is confessed or projected beyond Johansson’s terribly obvious surface.  Her performance feels so rootless and under-directed that I fought the urge to feed the poor thing lines in the hope it would prod her out of wandering and pouting.  And taking off her shit, jesus.  That Under The Skin was penned and directed by dudes is a notion that intruded pretty quickly and the volume of lingering and tenuously-motivated nudity had even my male partner chuckling; yes, we get the whole tangled web of visual reference thing, but they just should have called it Here’s Some Tits so you Wont Admit it was Boring.  That doesn’t put you off, does it?  Sigh.

It was boring, and for the worst reason- latitude.  There was so much of it that everything seemed to droop and flatten out in all directions.  A lot of that's on Johansson's performance, but let's pin this shit where it really belongs; Glazer should have gone with an unknown for the lead and spent the money nailing down some flapping edges, since there were plenty of them.  For example- the massive challenge to tone posed by warty Scottish verité in the face of Johansson’s lacklustre otherness- an experiment that required much stronger oversight.  The two performance styles just did not clash and spark like they should have, leaving the first looking just stupidly inept (whatever the truth around the local performances- there's that pesky skepticism again) and the second foolishly mannered.  The predator’s obscurity could have been fine but there is peril in that sort of silence; it devolved into a dull second act and a denouement that had me A: discounting its literal probability right from the start and B: laughing out loud through a mouthful of popcorn and wondering exactly what it was that made black jellybeans so fucking delicious.
Picture
It could be argued that the nourishing of the plasm itself is worth the price of admission and it does provide the most satisfying sequences, hiving off in a cute, if wilfully arbitrary stylistic riff that infuses the strangeness of dream horror into the mundane choreography of physical congress, alluding uncomfortably to the relationship they’ve always enjoyed.  But these scenes and indeed everything else of fleeting value stick out like dogs’ bollocks against an arc that flounders into sketchy production values, fumbled emphasis and patience-baiting repetition.  And I could mutter something about Under The Skin’s best moments feeling... overly cribbed... but whether you consider such things knowing homage or cheap pastiche is best decided privately.

So yeah- not a dead loss, but a big disappointment.  That the thing was shamelessly oversold in the midst of a weird-shit drought is not exculpatory and nor was it a contribution to our shared impression of generalised paucity and tediousness, and those are harsh words indeed from people with a lot of time for digression, rough edges and honest imperfections.  That, and there is a wide stripe of insistent and quite icky cruelty in UTS that is neither explicitly motivated nor especially revelatory, leaving me with the need to wash my mental hands a few times afterwards and as there's no compelling reason to subject oneself to it, the sensitive and empathetic should probably consider themselves warned.  If you’ve sipped Johansson’s Kool Aid you might enjoy her stilted antics, but she’s so much like McConaughey in her single-trick fuckery that I just couldn’t lie back and take it, especially in something so utterly dependant on finesse and transparency.  She could have slapped us all with the delicious prismatic irony of her very presence in this thing- if she’d had the chops to testify on her own behalf.  Apologists might ponder that, if nothing else.  A lot of people seemed to love Under The Skin, because... I don't know... bewbs?  I'm told they're popular.

*   More Hostile Witness Review   *   Best of the Blog   *   Read the Book onsite   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Dallas Buyers Club (2013, Jean-Marc Vallée)

2/10/2014

 
Picture
Sigh.  Those obligatory Oscar watches, eh?  Dallas Buyers Club isn't something I was gagging to wrap my corneas around.  I'd already formed an opinion, scraped like gilt with my magic mental teaspoon (I trust that thing implicitly) from the reactions of others and let's just say the result hadn't frogmarched me to the cinema.  But in the interests of this review I swept the old intellectual desktop clean and gave it a chance.

Ron Woodroof (Matthew McConaughey) is a skanky electrician rolling round Texas rodeos in the mid-eighties.  He contracts AIDS, is given a month to live and sets about obtaining alternative treatments for himself and others with the help of the transgendered Rayon (Jared Leto), who gives him entrée to the queer community he despises.  His entrepreneurial efforts set him against the medical establishment and more importantly the American Food and Drug Administration, who prosecute and sanction him at every turn.  A simple, cogent premise that could travel in a dozen riveting directions, right?

Picture
I'll speak first to my fellow beady hypercriticals and say depleted palette.  Because a lot of you will know what that means- code brown, my friends.  Arthouse lite.  Fincher institutional colours/take my secretive genius seriously filter.  It's such a Pavlovian cue now and fucking everyone's doing it, so note to filmmakers everywhere; enough with the backed-off sepia and faux-polaroid anachronistic foolishness.  It's played out, mmmokay?

Overworked stylistic flourishes do have a value in that they refer, perversely and rather ruthlessly, to both narrative deficits and dodgy performances.  Dallas Buyers Club features both.  While Woodroof's persistence and native resourcefulness are explored, the story is undercooked and overlong; in a word, flabby.  Sometimes boring, and without even using that grind to put us into his skin or really serving the matter to hand.  There is at least some laudable ambiguity around the morality of Woodroof's modus, but I felt that was something dumped in front of me and left to languish, bereft of the examination it possibly deserved. 

At the heart of the film's problems is the division of attention.  Too much was/is lavished upon the two leads, who can't really reward or sustain that scrutiny while everyone else is reduced to walk-on cardboard, including token chick Dr Saks (Jennifer Garner).  She bangs a wall with a hammer in frustration (I shit you not), but then I've yet to see Garner even come close to transcending the mediocre material that seems to be her lot.

Picture
McConaughey's performance is adequate, if you accept that you're only going to get the very few things he can do, regardless of what is actually required (exhibit A: True Detective).  Leto is typically, terribly thirsty, tooth-achingly self-conscious, running out of stunt queen moves halfway through his role and just tapping out and going limp when shit gets real.  That he could not rise to the dramatic opportunities posed by parental confrontation and pointy-end mortality tells you... well, everything you need to know.  

It's not all his fault; as a character, Rayon is superficially recognisable, but also a sloppy pastiche of workhorse clichés and lazy framing, a microcosm of this thing in the round and here's where I go into mini-rant mode.  No one would argue that clichés are without value or even authenticity; they are one of the founding structures of any subcultural expression after all.  But in the game of militant personal identity, attendant clichés are also knowingly subverted, kicked around and punted into the stands rather than regarded as the kind of gospel suggested by these hamfisted depictions.  So many extrinsic observers of otherness miss this glaring subtext.  Let loose without an ounce of subtlety or irony between them, McConaughey and Leto look like the mugging goons they are.  Two fucking Oscars, my arse.

Picture
Anyone with even a passing interest in the AIDS crisis and the establishment's response knows the FDA and successive political/medical administrations have been major villains in the tragedy that is still unfolding.  Dallas Buyers Club could have gone a lot further into those still trackless woods and profited greatly from the telling of such dreadful and complicated things.  But it's just not that kind of film.  After all the hype and oversaucing, DBC is still a B-, and that's only because I'm in a good mood.

*   More Hostile Witness Film Review   *   Best of the Blog   *   Read the Book onsite   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Jiro Dreams of Sushi (2011, David Gelb)

12/8/2014

 
Picture
Documentaries.  If you watch them as often as we do, you've probably been burnt by the fake hype and masturbatory/flea circus productions that tend to infest the genre and may well be averse to the prospect of yet another hand-held omphaloskeptical exposition.  I take an extremely dim view of anything that brings the idiom into disrepute and subject them all to one criteria- is it informative and absorbing beyond the constraints of its subject matter?  Whether you are specifically interested in the topic to hand or not, Jiro Dreams of Sushi surpasses this requirement.  

Most of all, it rejoices in a worthy protagonist.  At eighty-five, Jiro concerns himself with something far more abstract than the glistening morsels fashioned so lovingly in his renowned kitchen, namely excellence, that most elusive of beasts.  “Once you decide on your occupation, you must immerse yourself in your work.  Fall in love with your work.  Never complain about your job.  You must dedicate your life to mastering your skill.  That's the secret of success.  And is the key to being regarded honourably.” he assures us.  With seven decades in the game, three Michelin stars, an unimpeachable reputation and two adult children committed to his legacy, you could be forgiven for thinking that Jiro might have actually overtaken the standard to which he aspires.  But his ambivalence is obvious; slices of sea creatures and gobbets of grain both express his devotion to deliciousness and stand eternally between him and objective perfection. 

Picture
Jiro Dreams of Sushi employs a simple blend of observation and direct inquiry.  The perverse stoicism of Japanese masculinity, the hypnotic beauty of sushi preparation, the wood, the knives, the glorious lacquerwork fish, the octopus softening in its own protesting slime; all are grist to the visual mill.  And in this largesse lies a deeper purpose; illuminating the practise of excellence for its own sake.  Within the context of traditional Japanese society excellence is enviably quantifiable.  To be pronounced shokunin- an artisan, a guardian and exemplar- and more personally, to regard yourself as performing at the peak of your ability, is the goal to which Jiro, his sons and apprentices aspire.

To the contemporary observer, excellence is an anachronistic concept almost bereft of authenticity, and against this expectation Jiro's way seems at first like little more than submission to a conservative doctrine.  But the tension between orthodoxy and the personal militancy of virtuosity is the true heart of the matter and the thing I've thought about for weeks afterwards.  Jiro's badarse skill set and the lifelong grind of acquisition are both plainly illuminated, challenging the idea that excellence is too costly to achieve as well as being too provocative to value.

Picture
Tokyo is conveyed as I recall it personally; a melange of the baffling and the prosaic, a grittily industrial and perfunctory matrix studded with oblique slashes of beauty and strangeness.  Jiro's atelier quietly navigates this increasingly complex ecosystem, both gently predatory in their pursuit of the produce on which they depend and utterly subject to the vagaries of their supply.  This increasingly fraught aspect of sushi's destiny as both cuisine and artform is something I would have liked to hear these veteran exponents explore in a lot more depth; the moments devoted to the worsening crisis of supply and the environmental catastrophes behind it are frustratingly brief, given the fundamental consideration paid by shokunin to their materials.  

Picture
I could also complain of a painfully tasteful score that sometimes abolishes the sounds of the kitchen itself when the small wet patter of the morsels folded in the master's hands is something we almost leant forward in order to appreciate.  Curious also is the seemingly obligatory emphasis on interpersonal dramatics that may or may not exist, especially when Jiro's sons seem pretty down with filial duty and primogeniture, quietly resisting the attempts to frame them as downtrodden or malcontent.  And can I just say that I hated the promotional image, suspecting it referred to the unfortunate vein of poke-it-with-a-stick tourism that runs through so many similar explorations, despite their positive intent?  It's a weird lapse that almost dissuaded me from viewing this otherwise rather polished and engrossing effort.

JIRO DREAMS OF SUSHI is available on iTunes.

*   More film review Here   *   Other Selected Ravings   *   Photoessays Here   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Out of the Furnace (2013, Scott Cooper)

16/7/2014

 
Picture
Ever sat down to a movie you've heard nothing about, full of exemplary talent and a premise that's not too played-out?  You know- that feeling of pleasant, hopeful expectancy- you're settling in, the opening shot's going okay, cue music... then a song starts wheezing away over the top of it all and it dawns on you.  You're experiencing a taste-level indicator and the arrow's pointing downwards.  That first whiff of corn.  And then the thing unfolds and you can't decide if it was a solid idea that got smothered in cheesy development, or a cheesy kernel of a thing that almost got off the ground with far more help than it deserved.  I always suffer a pavlovian clench when I see that thirsty Scott Free animation fronting anything these days and Out of the Furnace just reinforced that response.  A flick that hadn't pinged my radar despite heavyweight backers and my fondness for the cast is always a dodgy prospect.  Oh well.  It was a slow Tuesday night and we took the plunge like the thrillseekers we are.

Picture
Plotwise, here tis; hardworking do-right guy Russell (Christian Bale) tries to keep his shit together in a dying mill town while his troubled veteran brother Rodney (Casey Affleck) entangles himself, with the aid of loan shark John (Willem Dafoe), in a bare-knuckle fighting ring run by psycho hillbilly Harlan (Woody Harrelson), attempting to exorcise demons and make rent.  Russell's girlfriend (Zoe Saldana) bails when he goes down for a DUI, taking up with the local cop (Forest Whitaker).  Things go from bad to worse, etc. etc.  It's a basic-bitch scenario that could have gone either way; it's absolutely possible for worse arcs than this to be buoyed by an especially nuanced script and transcendent performances.  Or they can be dragged by their own lugubrious weight in spite of any such advantages.  It pains me, but in this instance I nominate door number two.

Out of the Furnace isn't a dead loss, and that makes its shortcomings all the more perplexing.  The cast delivers, the production values are high and the dialogue, such as it is, is well handled.  But (as seems to happen so often lately) what could have been so much more boils down to a lacklustre narrative poncing around in expensive, finely-wrought visuals, top-shelf players and noble intentions, signifying little.  It almost gets off the ground a couple of times and you assure yourself that it surely must, only to watch it lapse back into blerg, adhering grimly to the conventions of its pedestrian trajectory instead of stepping off into something more.

Picture
Ultimately, Out of the Furnace is sunk by two related defects.  The plot is a shower of romanticised bollocks, for one.  As a resident of a formerly industrial barrio, I can shoot holes in that shit all day.  In reality, all of these characters would be skinny-fat, rat-faced, mullet-greasing xenophobic meth monkeys, not just Harrelson's 'inbred'.  Such is the peril of voicing a complex story via sympathetic/at least absorbing characters amid poverty and generational decline; the latter are such depressingly universal experiences that you can't swing and miss about any of it, really.  The drug-buying scene; oh honey, no.  Tweaky Appalachian hood rats do not generally adopt you and take you back to their cook house, even if you do respeck their whip.  Your struggling heroes probably don't perform spontaneous tokens of reverent personal decency and everyone knows dignity and principle are the first things dumped on the verge when socioeconomic shit gets real.  And don't get me started on the tattoos.  Which leads me to the second point- the wet-dream cast as a bone of contention.  While Harrelson, Dafoe and Saldana (if I see one more token woman-as-passive-adjunct in the next month, I'm going to choke somebody out) can do low-end, Bale in particular is a poor fit for deprivation, trying his best to disguise that physical noblesse that is so fundamental to his onscreen presence.  Whitaker just sort of shuffles around stolidly.  Affleck girns and slouches and affects volatility but never gets there, hampered by inconsistency of characterisation in a script that can't seem to decide if he is inarticulate or not.  See that squishyface he's trying for on the poster?  Disney ghetto.  The clunky touches don't stop there; the spliced fight/hunting scene that had me girning and slouching (the dewy-eyed deer; it burns!) is quite emblematic of the film's failings as a whole.

Watch Out of the Furnace on a slow night, by all means; it's a dog, but we didn't hate-hate it.  The superlative visual tour of America's arse-end alone is worth your rental dime and since I just pecked the eyes out of it for you, you can leave your critical faculties in the charger.

*   More film review Here   *  Time to kill?   Check out some Photoessays   *


Hostile Witness Film Review: Inside Llewyn Davis, 2013, Joel & Ethan Cohen

25/6/2014

 
Picture
What do you tell someone about a Cohen Brothers movie?  You'll love it, trust me.  Not at all formulaic.  Action packed.  Stuffed to the gills with loveable rogues.  That would be a pretty universal no.  Ever met someone who can articulate precisely why they pay to see one?  Again, no.  Even so, what I'm about to say is tantamount to blasphemy- Barton Fink and No Country for Old Men bored me more than anything, I think them overrated and the prospect of more Cohenic genius feels... like being invited to spectate hot sex between two people I dislike.  Ambivalent.  I'll confess also to feelings of confusion and dismay at the promise of folk music; to not knowing when they're taking the piss because it all looks like a pisstake to me.  And you know, it got so much darn festival oxygen... I'll cop to scowling at that too. 

To the uninitiated, it's probably most useful to declare the Cohens consistent, if nothing else; consistently adult, consistently juvenile, consistently earnest, sarcastic, innovative, reiterative; simple and complicated.  Inside Llewyn Davis is all of these things, and... sort of... less.  Though fortunately more than the sum of its parts.

Picture
Davis is a folk singer and human ingrown toenail shuffling between couches in Greenwich Village, 1961, down to his last hundy after losing his offsider to suicide.  The narrative doubles back over itself in a series of loops familiar to anyone afflicted by the creative impulse; getting dicked by your representation, arbitrary rejection, the desultory mining of played-out friendships, petty rivalries, the bloodied perversity, the weight of your own limbs as you drift inexorably toward the prospect of abandoning the only thing that keeps you breathing.  The universality of both these unhappy truths and their masochistic savour lie at the heart of ILD's success.  There is no catharsis, no wind machine, no mercy, no gilding of the dour lily that is Llewyn himself- that wight at once too good and too darn faulty to prevail- only the karmic spiral and moments of painfully intimate identification.  Full marks to Oscar Isaac for delivering such perfect and unlovely pitch; he is excellent in all respects.  As are Goodman, who refines that glorious shit with every innings, a grunting Hedlund and his mesmerising dirt lip and others comprising a top-shelf constellation of minor players.  Both Mulligan and her character are less convincing; I know Jean is supposed to thwacketh with bitter wings, but her delivery felt too screechy and uneven to be convincingly screechy and uneven, if you know what I mean.  It felt stiff, a little tone-deaf, and while one might lay this at the feet of the writing in this instance, tone and assurance are problems I've had with many of Mulligan's performances, except for her work in McQueen's despondent Shame. 

As with most of their previous stuff, Llewyn Davis enjoys the faintest spritz of eau de magical realism, or at least a whiff of its metaphorical cousin once removed.  While some find this flirtation charming, I find it slightly craven and even cynically appropriative at this stage, utilising its devices and traction without incurring the scorn so often flung at the genre.  Would it kill the Cohens to quit their borrowing and go the whole hog, just one darn time; to bite off something more than they might be comfortable chewing?  And while yes, we see the sweaters, irksome are the punches pulled instead of landed squarely on the face of the matter to hand, given Llewyn's potential as a weapon and indulgent folk's low-hanging fruit.  Too much tee hee, not enough burn.

Picture
Visually, ILD benefits inestimably from typically beautiful, if understated compositions and a soft, depleted palette, an autumnal Kodachrome that is such a relief from the garish treatments trotted out of late (serves me right for fucking myself in the eyes with shit like Pacific Rim.)  Aurally, it profits from some fine vocal performances from the players themselves, which impressed me retrospectively.  I'm clueless as to the depth and value of the oeuvre's in-jokes, but I'm sure there are plenty of easter eggs arrayed for the cognoscenti.  The Cohens' artless and/or cruelly puerile delight in directing our attention to every curious tic and bizarre convention they've observed is a guilty and eternal pleasure.  And of course, anyone who can exploit Justin Timberlake's conceit to the extent that he'll submit to being the panto horse's arse like he does here deserves marshmallows in their hot chocolate; the spectacle is all the more amusing for the victim believing himself privy to the whole spectrum of ironic implication.  Do you think he ever really sees himself?  Lol.  Me either.   

Picture
Flicks like Inside Llewyn Davis will always present critical challenges.  Working obscure subject matter into wilful gold can be its own reward and just as gratifying to a thoughtful audience.  It can seem petty to castigate a mature modus for being, well, mature, but it's important to question when and if peak Cohen has tipped over into just preaching to a bunch of breathless converts.  Superfans will probably lap up every umber moment with some sort of artisanal spoon, and now that I've kicked it around in my head for 24 hours, I'm more convinced of ILD's subtle merits than when the credits were rolling.  Not sure if I would have had the nerve to try and sell this story to anyone myself, but that's why I'm not a respected auteur.  The fact that they sold it to me is a peculiar achievement.   Inside Llewyn Davis is available on iTunes now, at least in NZ.

*   More film review Here   *


<<Previous

    RSS Feed

    Picture

    Independent Creativity
    Hi-Fi Introversion

    ORIGINAL CONTENT
    HONEST REVIEWS
    VELVETEEN VERBIAGE
    VISUAL LUXURY
    MORBID IDLING
    THE NATURAL WORLD
     
    ​photography  
    film
    flora  fauna  culinary
    ethnography  objet
    ​

    modest living
    ​vintage shit

    A U T H O R
    Picture
    K ✂︎ l l y
    congenital delinquent
    Human Durian
    celebrating
    glorious deviation in the land of
     the long white cloud

    -  New Zealand  -


    - T h e   B o o k -

    Picture
    T H E  
    B L A C K T H O R N
    O R P H A N S


    What is freedom, when it is
    all that remains to you?
    In exile two brothers pursue an anarchist's trajectory,  from an old world into the new, from East to West, subject always to the pleasures & horrors of an enduring flesh, to the ironies of karma & impunity. Love bears thorns, the lost return & the dead are haunted by the living. 
    ​

    E P I C   D A R K   F I C T I O N
    *   R E A D   *
    T H E
    B L A C K T H O R N 
    O R P H A N S
     O N S I T E  

    H e r e



    Picture

    Selected
    ​Ravings

    opinion essays observation private regret public 
    exaltation semicoherent speculation 

    Picture

    Photoessay​

    epic undertakings
    documented

    ​
    Picture

    Hostile Witness FilmReview

    Cruel but fair

    Picture

    RubyHue 
    ​
    Lipstick Review

    Lipstick: love it
    ​

    Picture

    Our Photography​

    we've seen worse
    ​

    Picture

    Port Chalmers​

    Dunedin, New Zealand
    ​

    Picture

    Blackthorn ​
    ​Rose Review

    Garden Hoe Wisdom
    Picture

    Verse​

    Loss, love, truth, beauty everything, everything
    ​
    Picture

    The  Lovely R's Blog​

    Likes photography  Knows a bit about it

    Picture

    We Liked This​

    Amazing things from other people
    ​

    Picture

    Cacti, Aloes
    ​&
     
    Flora​

    Our garden & general vegetal splendours
    ​

    Picture

    KitchenBitch

    Home cooking
    & raw ingredients
    ​
    Picture

    Ethnographic​

    Strange wonderful things from elsewhere
    ​

    Picture

    Jewellery
    ​

    Picture

    Tiny Little 
    Dinosaurs
    - a book for children -


    All images & text property of the authors 
    ​
    unless stated

    © us
    & original sources
    All Rights Reserved



    Picture

    Privacy Policy
    ​This is a noncommercial site.
    No ads. No shady data jacks. 
    No interest in your bizniz.

    ​We don't personally view, utilise or sell your data, apart from occasionally checking totally anonymous + super basic site view stats. We don't even know how to monetise that stuff, so don't worry.  Everyone's privacy is important to us.

    Our platform is probably harvesting your data, though, via their cookies. Look at their privacy page so you can see what they're up to.

    Please use Adblock or something similar.
    ​
    Google et al superimpose ads that we never see a penny from so fuck them.

    Picture

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013


    Picture

    Categories

    All
    A Thing Of Beauty
    Blackthorn Orphans
    Blackthorn Rose Review
    Cacti & Aloes
    Ethnographica
    Flora
    Hostile Witness Film Reviews
    Jewellery
    Kitchen Bitch
    Make Up Review
    Maximum Respect
    Perfume Reviews
    Photo Du Jour
    Photo Essay
    Places & Things: A Blackthorn Review
    Port Chalmers
    Remembering Dreams
    Roses
    Selected Ravings
    Softcore Rendition
    Sweetmeat
    Textiles
    The Lovely R
    Verse
    We Liked This

    Picture
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.